NEWS BLOG: Obama and Romney campaigns shouldn’t trivialize the presidential race


Oh, the irony.

In a lengthy piece, a couple of writers for Politico are bemoaning the smallness of the 2012 presidential race, which they say is due to Twitter and the 24-hour, seven-day-a-week news cycle. Politico embodies aspects of what a Columbia Journalism Review article calls the “hamster wheel approach” to news. But at least the writers admit this:

“The endless news cycle, infused with partisanship thanks to cable news and coupled with the Internet-age imperative to produce faster, more provocative copy, has amplified every cynical and self-indulgent impulse of the political press — POLITICO included.”

But enough of my cynicism. The article is excellent for the points it makes, for the truth it contains, and for the fact that two respected political reporters – Maggie Haberman and Alexander Burns – explain how the media and the candidates are shortchanging voters.

“The Obama and Romney campaigns spend all day strafing each other on Twitter, all while decrying the campaign’s lack of serious ideas for a serious time,” they write. “Yet at most junctures when they’ve had the opportunity to go big, they’ve chosen to go small. Obama has spoken in broad strokes about his accomplishments but has not yet outlined a detailed agenda for a second term. Romney has openly declared that he will not detail his policy proposals — slashing the size of government, for example — so as to avoid giving his opponents ammunition.”

Voters deserve to know presidential candidates’ positions and ideas. It shouldn’t matter if that’ll provide fodder for opponents. Disagreement and substantial debate are what big elections are about, or should be about.


One comment

  1. Mr. Moule apparently hasn’t taken a good look at the American Electorate lately. If he had he might have noticed that they aren’t out in the streets demanding that the two candidates engage in serious debate. Nor are they complaining that they’re being short-changed. What they ARE doing, when they do anything at all, is responding favorably to the “small” style of campaigning epitomized by the use of useless (for this purpose) technologies such as Twitter, Farcebook, etc.
    A candidate would be a fool to waste his/her time and money trying to hammer a lengthy or detailed message into the heads of those who live in world bounded by such short-attention-span activities as texting and nattering on cell phones.

    You want to blame somebody Mr. Moule, then blame the “consumers”, not the “suppliers”. The fault dear Brutus, is not in our candidates, but in ourselves !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: